Section 106 Agreement Land Charge

Lawyers negotiating s106 bonds should be familiar with cadastre procedures and ensure that the wording is safe for the future so as not to hinder subsequent transactions. Buyers of the houses have an interest in the land and are bound by the obligations set out in Article 106. A person may not be bound by a planning obligation if he or she is no longer interested in the land (§106(4) TCPA 1990) after the statutory release provided for in Article 106(4) of the TCPA 1990, unless there is already an infringement. In terms of developer contributions, Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) has not replaced the Section 106 agreements and the introduction of CIL has resulted in a strengthening of the 106 tests. With regard to developer contributions, S106 agreements should focus on the specific risk reduction needed for further development. CIL was designed to deal with the broader effects of development. There should be no circumstances in which a developer pays CIL and S106 for the same infrastructure with respect to the same development. The fact that buyers of real estate are in too much of a hurry or too reckless to conduct adequate investigations before acquiring land should not be properly taken into account in the definition of the planning policy. As noted above, we consider that the imposition of such obligations by a local planning authority would not fall within the scope of Regulation 122 of the CIL Regulations, as it is not “necessary” to allow the granting of a building permit for the respective development. The planning obligation is a formal document, a document indicating that it is a planning obligation, the relevant land, the person giving the commitment and his or her interest, and the competent local authority that would enforce the commitment. The obligation may be a single obligation or a multi-party agreement.

DCLG has published a guide to support changes to the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, which contains more detailed information on what is needed to change the provision of affordable housing in a Section 106 commitment and assess change requests. It is a guide to the format of the application, complaint and evidence; in particular the necessary evidence of viability and how it should be assessed. A Section 106 agreement is part of the planning process and is an ancillary authorization requested by a developer. This is a bilateral agreement between a developer and an LPA pursuant to section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990). A Section 106 agreement allows a AAA to impose restrictions on the use of the country or the operation of development or to contribute financially to local facilities and infrastructure. As part of the review of a construction application, Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 allows local authorities to negotiate with developers certain works, restrictions or contributions to a number of infrastructure and services such as community amenities, public spaces, traffic improvements and/or affordable housing. These agreements are a well-established and valuable mechanism for mitigating some of the effects of a development proposal. They are often used to reconcile development with the Sustainable Development Goals, as expressed in relevant local, regional and national planning policies. The planning obligations contained in s106 agreements or s106 unilateral commitments, arising from the legislation, take effect as basic local fees and may, as such, be entered in the public registers kept by the councils.

. . .

This entry was posted in Uncategorised by admin. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.